That is not the argument at all. The argument is if Bitcoin Cash does scale to billions of users and that it was necessary to use the full 32mb everyday then it would centralize the network with users losing the ability to run their own full nodes. Or is becoming a widely used global network for decentralized payments not in Bitcoin Cash's long term roadmap?
take any altcoin including imagine btc with 32mb blocks. (i know you love trying to pidgeon hole me into the ver camp. but thats your failure of understanding and ur failed attempt to divert attention away from the real problem. so lets stick to the debate of scaling)
billions of users by midnight .. nope
gigabyte blocks by midnight.. nope
floopy disks vs microsd by midnight.. nope.
scaling over time vs leaping overnight.. nope.
people doing 100tx a day.. nope (people do ~40 fiat transactions a MONTH and only ~5 btc tx a MONTH)
so dont exaggerate... well i actually mean dont take the reddit script exagerations.. but you get my point
chill out on the reddit scripts of disaster by sunrise and realise the reality.. buffer space now to avoid deadlock/debate in years.
stop living in the floppy disk era of 1.44mb is more than enough.
many people have 256GB portable storage on their devices whether they need it or not. they dont go to shops demanding only a 1.44mb floppy because all they want to hold is 2 images
think rationally.. 20 years ago was floppy disk era. 10 years ago was SD era. now its microsd era.. imagine the next 5-10 years
P.S we are no longer in dial-up internet era either. .. fibre and 5g cellular has arrived
You can argue for years but the Bitcoin Core developers will never be pressured to hard fork to bigger blocks because there is the minority in the community plus the sockpuppets, that is led by the fraudster Roger Ver, the scammer Craig "Faketoshi" Wright, and in connivance with Bitmain founder Jihan Wu. We are already witnessing network centralization of bigger blocks on Ethereum.
Plus you have your big blocks in Bitcoin Cash. As you want to believe, "Bitcoin has bilaterally split in two". Good luck to your big blocks.
now luke JR says 4mb weight is good but lets bring policy.h down to 0.5mb (facepalm)
I believe what was being avoided was the risks of a hard fork? There are people out there who want to kick out the Core developers. The "2x" hard fork was one supposed to be one of their traps. But post quotes and links of the facts. I would like to read them.
luke wantd to avoid hardforks....?? .. pfft.. no. luke wanted to avoid the network voting against the cor roadmap. basically not following the core roadmap, so he went out screaming that everything not core roadmap was bad.. and then went on and became part of the 3 shell trick game to actually cause a harkfork (mandatory bilateral split)
i call it the 3shell game because it appears as if its 3 choices to make on august first, but when you look under the shells, the result is the same.
USAF, BLOQ, ABC are all part of the same thing all paid by the same investors. (DCG.co)
The Kardashians drama? Hahaha. There were also rumors from /r/btc that Blockstream is part of the Bilderberg group.
and your love for reading reddit and taking what is said on reddit as gospel. i shall give you your dream and desire of quote and of format you desire.
Then do you believe that Roger Ver, Craig Wright, and Jihan Wu are the people that we should listen to, follow and support?