Yes. Start using your head.
1. Evolution theory evolution is impossible. Google "impossible evolution." The rebuttals to impossible evolution rebut themselves by being filled with assumptions, circular references, and ambiguities.
2. In a previous post I showed an article where mitochondrial DNA for life could not have existed beyond 200,000 years ago, scientifically speaking. The point is that science agrees that it is self-contradictory regarding when the first life appeared. Time to throw the baby out with the bath water.
3. All the supposed missing links in the fossil record, cannot be proven to have been missing links. Why not? Because the jump between any of them would have to be so great that the number of mutations from the before, to the ML, is unequivocally impossible in any form of evolution theory imaginable.
4. All supposed evolution forms that have been found, fit adaptation far easier than they fit evolution theory evolution.
5. In a previous post I showed that some of the smartest evolutionists agree that evolution barely has a leg to stand on, Stephen Gould being one of them.
6. No scientifically provable example of evolution has ever been found.
In other words, evolution as reality is impossible. If thinking evolutionists said that evolution was simply an idea, things would be different. But because they tout evolution as reality when nobody knows that it is...
Evolution is a hoax.
1. Evolution theory evolution is impossible. Google "impossible evolution." The rebuttals to impossible evolution rebut themselves by being filled with assumptions, circular references, and ambiguities.
2. In a previous post I showed an article where mitochondrial DNA for life could not have existed beyond 200,000 years ago, scientifically speaking. The point is that science agrees that it is self-contradictory regarding when the first life appeared. Time to throw the baby out with the bath water.
3. All the supposed missing links in the fossil record, cannot be proven to have been missing links. Why not? Because the jump between any of them would have to be so great that the number of mutations from the before, to the ML, is unequivocally impossible in any form of evolution theory imaginable.
4. All supposed evolution forms that have been found, fit adaptation far easier than they fit evolution theory evolution.
5. In a previous post I showed that some of the smartest evolutionists agree that evolution barely has a leg to stand on, Stephen Gould being one of them.
6. No scientifically provable example of evolution has ever been found.
In other words, evolution as reality is impossible. If thinking evolutionists said that evolution was simply an idea, things would be different. But because they tout evolution as reality when nobody knows that it is...
Evolution is a hoax.
1) Of course you find what you want if you google your predefined opinion. Thats actually circular logic. You should google evolution and then arrive at your opinion. You like the bible, right? Try google it and words like assumptions, circular references, and ambiguities? - Assumptions, circular references, and ambiguities exist in the attempted rebuttals against the impossibility of evolution. Evolution itself doesn't have even these legs to stand on.
2) So? Google again and find 200.000 articles that will show mtDNA have existed beyond 200.000 years. If you talk about mtDNA-Eve well 200.000 years sounds about right. - You checked all the links? In this short time? What you will find if you check the links, is a variety of time frames. And that is the point... not talk of 200,000 years. The variable time frames show that science doesn't know what it is talking about regarding evolution.
3) Of course it cannot be proven, its missing! The rest is just your opinion. - Actually, what is proven by the absence of 100% of the required missing links, is that they don't exist... just like evolution doesn't exist.
4) Yes it does! Because adaptation is evolution! Any change is evolution! - Tying your shoes is change. It is change that doesn't fit evolution theory evolution. So, change is not evolution, just like tying your shoes is change, but not evolution.
5) Hmm now how smart are they really if they dont believe in their own title? Are they evolutionist if they dont believe in evolution? Very strange! Im one of the smartest Creationists
- You talk about them believing in evolution or not. You talk the same way that people of the religions of the world talk about their religions. People believe their religions, and they don't believe other religions. So, you are helping to show us just what evolution is... a religion.6) Open your eyes. Its all around you, trillions and trillions of examples. - Blah, blah, blah. Open your eyes. Its all around you, trillions and trillions of examples of like-begets-like, without any examples of evolution. Where is the evolution? In the imaginations of a bunch of people who want to believe it. Or do you have scientific proof of even one instance of evolution?!
In other words, evolution as reality is possible! - Actually, the odds against evolution as stated in evolution theory is so great, that according to probability science, evolution is impossible.
Evolution is reality
In other words, you are helping us to see that evolution is a hoax, simply by trying to show us that it is real, but failing at it so miserably.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_link_(human_evolution)
https://theconversation.com/myth-of-the-missing-link-in-evolution-does-science-no-favors-46661
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/discovery-destroys-myth-of-missing-link-on-the-evolutionary-ladder-5360940.html
https://futurism.com/there-is-no-missing-link-in-evolution/
https://bigthink.com/ideafeed/the-missing-link-myth
https://www.quora.com/Why-havent-we-found-the-missing-links-in-human-evolution
I wish badecker was able to use google so he wouldn't use the worst possible arguments against evolution.