I am absolutely amazed by the way how critical questions and remarks are just brushed of as 'you are just jealous because you are too late' kind of statements.
It is as if no actual discussion is allowed, only when you utter words like to the moon etc?
I disagree with your assesment.
Criticism is good. There is nothing wrong with that.
Misrepresenting facts is not good. And saying that an IPO where investors get profit is "not fair" isn't really a useful statement.
What ís useful is constructive ideas about how to get those coins moving. As stated before: the founders are in a lock, too.
Market volume isn't big enough for them to bring all their coins to the market at the moment. The market would collapse and that isn't good for anyone.
Some people have suggested ways to do this. Most suggested "give it away".
Fair enough, that's a valid suggestion.
Some proposed a charity fund. Also constructive.
My point is that it's a good idea to distinguish between people shouting "not fair!" and then not adding any constructive idea (which leads to the impression they just want a piece of the pie too and and are in NO way interested in the NXT as a new currency, AT ALL) and people who raise valid concers that have something to do with the viability of NXT.
I agree shouting 'unfair' is not constructive. That is why I suggested to put 80% of the coins in a sort of trust fund and dole them out when transactions are executed. Apparently this has something to do with going to Church.
Having an ad supported faucet apparently is also not supported by most here.
I agree that giving them away is not constructive and is in no way supportive of the currency. There has to be some sort of work that has to be performed to get coins. So far not very many of these programs exist however. Maybe I just didn't look in the right places.