Thank you organo.
My main questions dealt primarily with the features that appear to be unique to the bitcoinwisdom chart. For example the time increments selected on top don't match up with the time the increments on the bottom. Yes clearly candlestick charts is an obvious question that can be looked up easily. My mistake for including that in my original question.
It might be better to just do one question at a time then.
As far as I can tell (just having made a quick check) the bitcoinwisdom chart intervals do match the times/dates on the bottom. Select "30m" at the top, and on the bottom you can see the hours and dates the candlesticks refer to. Unless you confused hours for dates? I can see how you could do that.
Yes. OP, there are so many "explain the details of X to me" on the internet it's nuts. "ELI5: Stock charts" would work, maybe. What I'm telling you is that they aren't different from stock charts, so there's nothing unique that requires asking at a Bitcoin forum.
Thank you organo.
My main questions dealt primarily with the features that appear to be unique to the bitcoinwisdom chart. For example the time increments selected on top don't match up with the time the increments on the bottom. Yes clearly candlestick charts is an obvious question that can be looked up easily. My mistake for including that in my original question.
Mr. Fenix, you're still not making sense. You keep giving an air of 'I can predict your every move' and 'you're an idiot'. But you know what, if you're really so smart why don't you just answer the question? Since you clearly know the answer, right?
Shall we go for round four? Last I checked you're still losing. You can do it!
The page I linked predicted your question. Not on purpose, of course. You just asked another question in the same category of trying to repaint a situation to make it seem like it is my fault you lack knowledge, as if there is no better source. If you desire answers to specific questions, like something about not seeing the correlation between the times, that is very different from asking for a user manual to be written just for you.
I know for a fact all the information you seek is a google away, because I knew nothing about charts once, and used nothing but google to learn. And using bitcoinwisdom has not required any new knowledge I didn't have from stock charts. Any time I hear someone ask a question that the first page of google answers with perhaps 10 minutes of your time, tops, I get testy. Unless you are for some reason not capable of accessing the internet. But guess where we are...
So, my air of "you're an idiot" that you detected is fairly accurate. I have largely given up on most friendships, because I always wind up with a rep for being "walking wikipedia" and many of those so-called friends approach me for even the simplest of things. This is offensive because it is a lack of respect and awareness. Doing this for such elementary questions requires the belief that your time is worth more than mine: It is not unique knowledge you seek, therefore you believe it will be faster to ask me than google, because I probably already learned it. This is often true, but it means that you do not respect my time as valuable. (Which I also find oddly paradoxical -- am I, then, viewed by these friends as living in a different timescale, or as a machine with unlimited time? Either way I'm clearly not their friend, but am kept around as a novelty for converting questions to answers.)
Say I learned it in 15 minutes, and perhaps it would take you 20 minutes to learn it yourself. But you figure I can teach it in 10 minutes. What you've just done is said that 25 minutes of my time (the required amount to give you what you want) is worth 10 minutes of yours (the amount saved by you). And that 10 minutes of your time is worth more than every single other thing I could do with my 10 minutes. Knowledge is not efficiently passed this way; that's why one of the first breakthroughs in human evolution and accumulation of knowledge was a system of writing. It automates the recitation part of passing knowledge.