But you still haven't provided "credible evidence of significant anthropogenic climate change from sources without a conflict of interest."
Because it's .....
The onus is on you to provide credible evidence of significant anthropogenic climate change from sources without a conflict of interest.
Why the **** would anyone need to do that?
Almost NOTHING on this planet happens without a conflict of interest, since people need to eat and therefore need someone to pay for what they do.
Researchers working in universities in general DON'T make very good money. And that's where 99 % of climate research is made. If it's a scam it is not going very well, judging from the fact that the ones I know take the bus to work because they can't afford a car.
I have said it before, and I'll say it again. If it wasn't so sad, it would be hilarious when deniers pull out Al Gore and "government scientists" when the concept goes back almost 50 years (though the term
global warming wasn't coined until the mid-70s), and the science it's based on is approaching 200 years. That alone says EVERYTHING about the amount of understanding the denier camp has.