Here are the poll results. 20% of voters support the idea that the community should be represented by one person, elected in democratic way.
He may be called a leader, manager ... But in fact that is a great hard job now to take responsibility for all the processes that are being run now around this project.
20% - without any preparation, and with
blocked access to any of the community channels... That is almost half of 50% needed for majority.
If one call me thief, liar, scam, troll it is only showing how interested in real development one is.Because all I put here are the ideas. I feel respectful for the community. And this is the main core of my motives to be here. When I was developer and learned the principles I noticed that bunch of people work against it.
Voting is the highest power in this community. Ignoring the will of community should be constitutionally blocked by leading to losing power automatically.
https://twitter.com/BartekHiLevel/status/1016287127741587456You are really approaching this wrong as far as working with any developer/project.
How is a manager going to effectively motivate a group of developers and engineers that are doing work for free most of the time?
Is he going to be performing one on one with each developer and performance ratings every quarter? What is he going to do when a developer just leaves? Developers like to solve a problem and they will work on things that interest them. The manager would add nothing to this side of project except for anger people.
Sounds like you really just want a single person to be the FACE(Steve Jobs type) of BitcoinZ for marketing purposes which seems wrong for a coin that has privacy built into it and against my idea of decentralization. I voted NO for your tweet when I came across the link on here.
Can you come up with an idea that is not centralized and controlling like the one you are proposing.