I am not for big blocks. Have you entirely failed to read the 300 posts of @anunymint which your apparently corrupt mod @mprep nuked?
*deleted since you were ban evading and were never supposed post here in the first place.
Also I think you should re-read my prior post and pay attention to the size 24 font text I inserted, which seems to imply corruption between your mod @mprep and user @stereotype who was so abusively critical of me. Click some of those links and read what was being said to me. Now in hindsight when I am not so ill, I can see they were colluding and @stereotype basically admitted it.
I was also the director for the fake moon landing and orchestrated the global distribution of laughing gas via chemtrails. /s
arcasmLet me be clear: I have no clue as to who user "stereotype" is and AFAIK did not have dinner with him. Considering that in his profile he marked his location as the UK, I think he might be referring to a british moderator, rather than me.
The bottom line is I was critical of and analyzing many flaws in the various shitcoins and so the shitcoins people got together with your Altcoin Discussion mod and decided to formulate a plan to shut me off.
Your self-importance is laughable. I ban your ban evading alts - that's it. I didn't (nor was I able to or requested to) even issue the original bans that got you booted off the forum.
Why should I agree to abide by corruption? Please give me a good[sane] reason?
If you think Bitcointalk's rules (which are put in place to facilitate constructive discussion) are "corruption", you are free to leave. You coming back (after swearing to never come back, twice) to a forum you deem horrible in both structure (centralized) and staff just seems like a pathetic attempt at garnering attention and sympathy.
As if I was not following the rules ever since you told me that multi-posting was my crime.

Once you get permanently banned from the forum, you have to appeal your ban before you can go back to participating on it. If you get banned from entering a store after repeatedly screaming at the employees, you don't get to just go back and say "yeah, I'm not screaming anymore, I can be here". You contact the owners and ask them to let you back in.
No I am not for sale to the highest corrupt bidder. I have my own ethics. If you want me to agree to be corrupt, sorry I can not follow you. I hope you understand. I will not join some kiss-ass, brown-nosing boyz club.
And you are free to do so. By never coming back. Like you've already promised. Twice:
<...>
No. He will never return to this forum nor any other website that has a database that is not open sourced on a blockchain.
<...>
<...>
No. He will never return to this forum nor any other website that has a database that is not open sourced on a blockchain.
<...>
If there is some objectivized thing you would like to adhere to, I probably will as long as it is not subject to corruption and corrupt subjectivity. I mean I was already following the rules. But the rules were never the issue of why I was hated. I was hated because I refuse to regurgitate what I am told to speak and not speak.
There's plenty of Bitcointalk users who could be defined as "hated" by the community or most staff. Yet they continue to participate on the forum because they adhere to the rules. You didn't - no matter how much you keep saying otherwise.
Forums naturally form discord. We all know that.
Yup, that's why they have moderators.
Anyway, I think frankly I am not that interested to return. All the smart engineers are gone from
bitcointalk.org. Theres no interesting technological discussion any more. Only when I join the threads does anything accurate get spoken these days. For example the current LN thread discussion is entirely incorrect. They do not understand the concept of a
natural monopoly and the scale is the barrier-to-entry in LN because of the liquidity issue.
Cool. You've said it three times now.
The only reason I came back last month was because the Proof-of-Approval thread. I was interested in that design and @Traxo made a few posts for me there, but then it became unmanageable to discuss via @Traxo helping me out. So I created my own account to discuss in that thread. I made one post in a thread about non-mining nodes dont matter, then the all the Core shills came in there to crucify me.
So your word (the 2 promises of never returning to Bitcointalk) means nothing? You lecture about ethics and corruption but can't keep your own word.
Fuck man, one of the threads that @mprep nuked, I had sent in an email to the President of the Philippines and senator Manny Pacquiao, along with upper level Dept. of Finance officials. Im planning to go visit Manny who lives 2 hours from me to congratulate him on his victory yesterday where he regained a title belt at age 39. Ive been his fan since he was only a local fighter here in Mindanao when I was age 33 before I was blinded in my right eye (Ive been living here in Mindanao since 1994).
Humblebragging and fishing for sympathy. Keeping it classy, anonymint.
For over a month I was posting as @anunymint with no major problems (other than the usual disbelief by n00bs such as yourself @theymos about the realities of technologies they dont understand) and then I made my first post in the Altcoin Discussion and instantly @mprep was alerted and he nuked everything in a scorched earth policy.
Funnily enough, I stumbled upon your newest alt from an unrelated report of one of your non-altcoin threads.
If I am so unworthy, then why did Matthew Laine with 180 IQ follow me on Quora? Why did another Omar Bessa from Quora with a 170 IQ also converse with me in email? And also Thomas West who claims to be 3 sigma was conversing with me there on Quora.
Neither I nor (AFAIK) theymos is saying you're unworthy. We're saying you have to abide by the rules everyone else has to abide by. You do not get a free pass for being famous / intelligent / rich / etc. Also, bragging about high IQ on an internet forum is literally a meme.