How do you prove that? I provided a link where he claims to have gone to lunch with a member of the Staff. And then we have you deleting some of my words in my posts (as evident by your red colored moderator notices in my posts) and so we know you were reading his attacks where is was attacking my children and sorts of insane accusations and did no moderation whatsoever to attempt to maintain the civility of the discussion. You allowed him to do that.
See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law) (note: vague statements, correlations and your gut feeling isn't proof). tl;dr I don't have to "prove" jack shit till you actually present direct and actual evidence of this imaginary "collusion" against you.
And your replies above look very similar to @stereotypes style of venom such as this:
See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm. Popular form of expression. Quite a lot of it seems similar, especially for users in the same community.
You perhaps have hoodwinked @theymos. I am beginning to wonder if maybe @theymos is the one being fooled by you.
While I'm flattered, I think you're giving me too much credit. That and you seem to ignore the fact that I'm enforcing one of the few most clear cut rules (ban evasion) while having
absolutely no hand in your original account's (AnonyMint) ban.
Funny. Unlike you, just because I think someone has a shit personality, doesn't mean I think they're "unworthy".