I think I resent the fact that I'm rated 82nd for generosity. Am I being penalised because i try to help more people with my awards?
I'm not sure what we have gained by publishing that list. Also, if it failed to detect me ( an admitted source ) then surely the analysis is flawed.
It seems that Coin-1's methodology failed to detect you (and other source members who were hero at the time of the implementation) because there is an assumption of 200 initial distribution s-merits, and heros only received up to 88 initial distribution s-merits (which Coin-1 acknowledged in a post subsequent to OP)... therefore, the generousity index is off in regards to those categories of merit source.. if that is the ultimate goal to inferentially establish merit sources.