When i initially joined bounty campaign, i didn't agree to the fact that signature campaign should be given a higher percentage in the bounty pool, especially when it has a relatively fewer participants compared to blog and social media. But i have now come to the realization that, signature campaign is the best form of advertisement for every ico. It helps to advertise the project to its target population. Almost every member on this forum is a potential crypto investor. Even bounty hunters can invest in their own small ways. Social media campaign has the potential of spreading the project to wider audience but not everyone they reach out to would be interested in investing in crypto. If we are talking about bounty campaign which ensures value for money, then i think its signature campaign. Friends what do you also think?
I think you complain because you have a small rank. If you were at least full member then complaints about the fact that subscription companies eat ~ 40% of the pool of the pool would have disappeared by themselves)))
He wasnt complaining actually he is just saying he has realized why its important. Signature campaigns allows you focus on your target audience and also gives you marketers who are forced to be loyal since they can only wear that signature and they also become eventual stakeholders in the project as they will earn the token. So you get a win - win situation where you sell your project and build a community of people who wwill understand what the project is about since they are crypto enthusiasts.