I did think about it. I found it to be bad timing on your part to announce you did this and that the announcement matches very odd behaviour of our miners. What I would like to know is how many miners other then the two mention have this problem which is why I posted this here. You have admitted you viewed 1100 plus miners. if only the two I mention have this problem after being viewed by you then most likely this has nothing to do with your testing.
Holy shit the entitlement here!
no not about entitlement. he admits to attacking passwords of 28 miners.
and in no place does he say he had permission. the 2 miners I own 9.5 % of had a hashing issue during the time he was brute forcing miners.
if I go to a gym locker and try a 3 digit combo lock 20 times a day until it clicks open I am breaking the law in most counties. even if I push it locked again.
the op admits to doing this with knc passwords. so dude this is not about entitlement. this is about the op admitting to attacking passwords on valuable gear. I am not the op. I am a part owner of 2 machines that the op may have attacked. so 28/1100 = 2.5% chance but I have 2 machines so about 5% chance he tried on my gear. my gear had a loss unexplained loss of hash power. what do you expect me to think?