I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I believe in ICO ratings, because it's a good way to know if the ICO that you will invest in is good enough and have the capability. ICO ratings are really a big help to those who are finding good ICOs to invest in because the higher the ratings is, the more trust of people will give it to that ICO.