Post
Topic
Board Alt-Currencies (Italiano)
Re: Memorycoin 2.0
by
jankko60
on 01/01/2014, 18:25:45 UTC
gpu mining / botnet

Ma come, hanno realizzato un client per minare con GPU + efficiente di quello x CPU su una moneta CPU-Only ?  Huh Huh

Edit : evidentemente sì , in pool

per gli interessati :

First 4 miners on mmcpool have above 1000HPM.

How can be possible without gpu mining?
It is about 500 pcs 4770k each one.... Shocked Shocked Shocked

and 1gh.com support MMC GPU mining.
my R9 280X = 25hpm!! overclocked

While gpu miners can now mine MMC, it's still not much more effective than cpu mining. It's the same with PTS, there are gpu miners, but you can still take part with a cpu with an almost equal result

There's even one advantage: botnets won't be as profitable as now when a lot of gpu miners join
Yeap, R9 280X = 5 x Core i7 (8 cores)

Freetrade,

With these numbers, I believe that Memorycoin 2.0 is NOT GPU resistant.

The R280x GPU can mine 22 HPM with a price at around $420.
That is around $20 per H/m. That is way too profitable for GPUs as opposed to CPUs.

The H/m equipment cost should be around $150 per H/m for CPU miners.
This is a big problem and I hope that you can correct this matter, either by forking MMC by using a new, more GPU resistant algorithm when starting Memorycoin 3.0.

If you already have the GPUs, you'll certainly want to use them.

The aim here is to make it unprofitable for people to go into business (with large GPU capital cost) because they'll be competing against a wide range of CPUs that have no capital cost (because they have already been purchased). Eventually the price of MemoryCoin should be the same as the electricity required to mine it. There's a window at the moment for profit, (because the knowledge is not widespread yet, and there is significant appreciation potential), but long term, things are working out exactly as intended.


E le chiamano cpu-only ?  Angry

J