what do you think about this?
https://medium.com/adamant-im/fair-delegate-system-in-dpos-568e5c3c86c8Vote weight = ADM / Votes,
Where Vote weight is the value of the wallet’s vote, ADM — the number of ADM tokens on this wallet, Votes — the number of votes of this wallet.
Suppose Bob has 100 coins, Alice has 80. Bob votes (delegates influence) for Bill and Helen, and Alice for Mark. Since Bob votes for two delegates, his vote is 100/2, that is, 50. Then Bill and Ellen have the following impact on the blockchain: 100/2 = 50, and Mark — 80. That is, Mark’s influence is greater than that of Bill and Helen. In the case of Lisk’s dPoS, Bill and Helen are more influential (100) than Mark (80), and that is unfair.
I think it more fair. If you have about 1% of supply (I assume the number of active delegates is 100) you can become a new active delegate.
But in the Lisk you don't. The Lisk system affected by the cartels and it's more centralized. And if you want to become an active delegate you either have to buy up about a quarter of the Lisks (is ridiculous) or negotiate with existing groups.
These are not the worst groups, they share a reward, conduct some kind of activity. But it's unfair from my point of view and prevents entry of new investors who want to become active delegate.
I now participate in the project where are the same system as you mentioned above: 1 coin = 1 vote. In terms of money it's more honest.