That's really amazing. That's mean people and another research sites really like this concept. That's why rating has been increased.
Congratulations Vanig Team.Wow, A big congratulations to the Vanig team but Im having a hard time accessing the above link to checkout the ratings. I will try it out later today again.
Basically Vanig got 4.26 out of 5 which is one of the highest ratings on the ICO Holder website. Great score for a great project, the reception from crypto experts has been excellent so far.
Exactly, while running ICO I seen 1st time rating has increased. That's really amazing and this is happened because of teams hardwork.
What was the previous rating? Do you think it is important to have such rating? I mean I know it is better than having a bad rating because then people researching would feel skeptical other than that do any of you guys use the sites to make an investment.
For a quick overview such rating sites are good. I checked the ICO Holder rating and can not understand why Vanig got such a bad rating in the Activity sector (3.08). In my opinion they are very active in all Social media channels. I don't know how they can be more active.
Bear in mind that quite a couple of these ratings are not a yardstick used to measure the viability and authenticity of an ICO project as many of these rating sites demand payment for a good rating.