Running a large Lightning Network node has been quite stressful.
An exploit such as we saw with heartbleed could allow an attacker to drain all funds from the node while Im sleeping.
An exploit like heartbleed could also allow an attacker to drain the funds from your standard BTC or altcoin wallet. Maybe you should just stop using all crypto. You clearly aren't cut out for this stuff.
Closing a channel using --force results in a unilateral close which makes the funds unavailable to me.
The amount of time the funds are locked up depends on the channel policy. This policy is negotiated when the channel opens.
Most channels will release the funds to me in between 1440 and 20180 minutes.
FYI:
20180 minutes is 336.33 Hours or ~2 weeks
Seems to me if the guy had complete control as some idiots think they do ,
he would not have to wait 2 weeks to find out whether or not his bitcoins are redeemed or lost forever.

Except they won't be lost forever. Also, this delay is only in the event of an uncooperative other party or you are the one forcing the channel closed. If you're dealing with a legitimate retailer/merchant and they become uncooperative and cause inconvenience to their customers, they're not going to attract much business. It's in their financial interest to follow the rules. For the average person, this isn't going to be much of an issue. It's fair to assume normal people ren't going to attempt running the largest node on the network. But perhaps the larger hubs may have greater concerns in this regard, since there may be slightly less incentive for those connecting to them to play by the rules. But then that supports the notion that LN
won't result in a small number of giant, centralised hubs, instead of how you keep arguing it will. So, as usual, thank you for undermining your own argument.