-snip-
Glad to see you've finally changed your mind, since the source you just used for your argument also says this:
Due to greenhouse gas emissions the Earth has already warmed as much in about the past 200 years as it ordinarily might in several thousand years, Clark said.
"One of the biggest concerns right now is how the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets will respond to global warming and contribute to sea level rise," Clark said
.....
You don't have "a case", except in your own delusional thinking, in which you are the Factboy, possessor of all correct facts, and others are either wrong or praise your keen insight.
This is another tired attempt to reframe an argument and misdirect. (e.g..
I'll say it again - if you have any actual facts/figures/evidence/data/proof to present for your side,...)
FROM: "All the ice will melt" and "An ice age is coming"
TO: the boring, trivial mantra of "Man's CO2 emissions will cause the planet to burn up!"
But I have news for you. Clark's comment about GGE is not inconsistent with his paper's thesis, methods or conclusions. It's not the subject of his investigation.
It's irrelevant to it, and you are just trying to shift the goal posts of the discussion.
..... the increase in unprecedented storm activity is being linked as an early indicator that things are changing.
What unprecedented storm activity? Climate is defined as weather over a minimum of three successive ten year periods. If you have seen some stormy weather that has pretty much zero relevance to climate averages.