You said that 6 months ago as well when you were claiming shares were worth at least 5 BTC and I explained why such prices were insane.
and yet, I was right, we did hit 5 btc.
The arguments I recently made are also perfectly valid.
and how about your arguments saying that Labcon would be worth 10x what they were sold for? Those didn't hold up, either.
Also, why would me telling people to do the maths themselves push the price down? Wouldn't that only be the case if the maths showed that the shares were overpriced?
you and I both know you can make the math say whatever you want to say, because you selectively pick data and numbers for calculations. Kinda like you saying Labcon would hit 1btc or more. You had math to back that up as well.
It seems like your math and reality don't match up too well.