....
Some interesting analysis and breakdowns on ethereum's platform. The majority of ethereum content posted on this forum is pro eth. There isn't much said on eth from the opposite perspective and so I hope people will not mind me sharing this. I tried to bold most of the relevent points but tbh the whole thing could be worth reading for anyone interested in these topics.
It looks as if the majority of investors are shorting ethereum under the expectation that it is overvalued and overpriced. They could majority wise expect the price to decrease. Over the short term that could be the trend we'll see, especially if a majority of larger institutional investors have formed a consensus on this.
Note how the quoted portions attempt to support their stance with facts and analysis. I think this attempt @ a rational overview is what was missing from the "bitcoin is a bubble" and "bitcoin is a tool for criminal and money launderers" hysteria which pervaded the media awhile ago. Could be something to consider in the days to come when media stories are aired without much if any attempt at verification.
It is an interesting read, like always Hydrogen, what I find interesting is that nowhere in the content you posted includes the most common complains against ethereum coming from the community, the first is the lack of limit in the emission of coins and without a limit Ethereum cannot be considered a store of value since in that aspect it is the same as fiat, and even more importantly the fork that created ethereum was different than the forks of bitcoin, the forks of bitcoin happened mostly as an attempt from opportunistic people to gain money out of it or in the case of bitcoin cash they wanted to take a different road to solve the scaling issues, but the fork of ethereum was created because its users disagreed with the way the hacking of the DAO was handled since they believe, and I believe as well, that the blockchain should not be tampered with.