Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: New BTC-Randomizer (Bitcat.ch Randomizer)
by
xyu
on 05/08/2011, 20:28:55 UTC
I dunno, I think it's good the way it is, with the exception of the rounds. I think they should be removed altogether, as they are only confusing. You should just get paid by your referrals when they sign up, there is no need to constantly take everyone's money and move it up the pyramid. With the whole rounds thing, all the money in the system will eventually be owned by user #1, everyone else will lose out in the end. I honestly don't see the point.

Nope, it wouldn't.  If user takes 50% of the round then his 1st lvl sponsor will only get 12% of initial round cost, 2nd lvl - 3,7%, 3nd lvl - 2.5%
The wealth moves upwards. For every round, wealth is moved three steps up. It doesn't matter if the sponsors only get 12%, 3.7% and 2.5%, the money they get only goes towards paying the next round fee, leading to the money moving up to that members sponsor, who in turn uses the money to pay his round fee, which moves up to his sponsor... until it reaches a dead end: the guy at the top. All money will, in time, move to user #1.

When does a round end in the current system? When 120% ROI has been achieved?

Suppose, we have 10 levels, the first level - the guy at the top, 10th level - guys at the bottom, we wouldn't take random payments for consideration for now. So, if guys at bottom have placed 10 btc then guys on the 9th level would get 10btc, guys on 8th - 5, guys on 7th - 2.5 and so on, each level keeps 50% btcs, so all wealth couldn't be moved to the one guy at the top.

But, yeah, after seeing how it goes at live, I'm starting thinking that I should have chosen the same way old randomizer worked