You are saying that you have decided not to let him/her into any of your campaigns? Why are you arguing then? You pay them for their posts and say you are out, There is nothing more to this.
I know you don't believe that. There's a lot more to it, as you can see. This campaign is heavily damaged now because of the words and actions of the manager who made a lot of mistakes and broke many rules.
I think you are missing the point here, You participated, posted and received the payment, Now you're out.
Whether the manager agreed to enroll you back or not, That's the manager's decision. You are not owed anything by anyone. One of the rules of every campaign is that the manager has the right to deny or accept anyone they want, You have been denied and they have already paid for your posts made last week.
They kicked me out in error and reduced my payment unfairly, and in error. They then accepted and stated they would fix everything and things would return to normal. These images mean nothing to you? And also scamming and lying and going back on an agreement worth $840 is nothing to you? They agreed to all of that AFTER the first terms and conditions, which means it overrules it. Your logic doesn't hold up at all. You don't care whether or not they agreed to something in writing? Which THEY DID agree to. These honestly feel like alts LOL because every logical counterpoint I make, which is held up by evidence, doesn't seem to phase you people with random opinions based on flimsy arguments. You keen on talking about payment? Talk about these payment interactions then.