Oh hey, a sportbet shill coming in here to try and save face for the extortion. High activity is not spamming. Go ahead and read some of those posts and see if they're duplicates.
And yet, my signature does not make what I say any less true. Your posts are not exact duplicates, but they are all ultimately saying the exact same things. You've used the same picture of your PMs in about 40 posts. That's spamming.
The agreement after the original agreement stands up stronger, as you can obviously guess. It was an amendment basically.
In your opinion, which is obviously not shared by most others.
You're right, your signature doesn't make it less true. It was never true to begin with, so something false can't be made more false. Actually, it's not an opinion, because common law has amendments change the original law all the time. If you think the campaign manager did nothing wrong in threatening and extorting agreed to payment to force an action by somebody, that's your morally deprived opinion. You can have it and we can discuss it. But the fact is that extortion is actually illegal.
If I was your boss, let's say roofing, and we had a 2 month project that we were working on and one day I think you showed up late because my watch was an hour ahead, and I fired you, is that ok? Is it then ok to say that if you say anything, I'll withhold all payment for previous work you've done?