Alright, I guess my thoughts count now since I am needed

(I'm just messing with ya!)
1) Yes start simple, add functionality (that is what I am working towards right now)
2) The automated DVC I was talking about was how to add a receiver line automatically once an admin approves a bounty payout.
3) The input will be simple for proposing, I figured the vetting and voting will take care of itself through comments and the voting I am putting into place
4) I am not sure about the pros/cons yet for having to have a devtome account, I am just doing that because I don't want to have to make people sign up for the site I am creating, I am just using usernames that are in the account files.
5) The system I am creating could be moved to any site that is running on a LAMP server. It can be edited to work on IIS or WAMP if need be. But, it is hard coded at this time for my server and database layout. It is a prototype after all!
I wasn't looking to get a bounty for what I was working on and I don't want to take away from anyone else that is working on things like I have on the site. Everyone is welcome to use what is there and make suggestions and what not, but I can't warranty any of it! At least not yet!
Chad
Think I might be getting confused between different ideas, but in general I reckon all constructive ideas are good - putting them in practice even better. I don't have the skills to build these things so I go for shares/monetary contribution and then using them. If you build a site and it's implemented then I'll contribute to any bounty or give you something myself regardless, I see that as the essence of the way devcoin should work. All thoughts count, that's the point I was making about how input into any system would work - i.e. making sure it's as inclusive as possible.