No, that would not be ok, but jeremypwr admitted his mistake, apologised
It's interesting this user acknowledges the criminal activity, yet because the criminal says sorry, he is simply forgiven.
I never acknowledged anything of the sort.
If you read the full post, you had provided a ridiculous and incomparable analogy, and it was that analogy I was referring to with the words "that would not be ok". The rest of my post goes on to explain just how wrong you are.
Just like you did with yahoo62278, you've lied again by taking a single phrase completely out of context to make it look like it supports you, when in fact it is the exact opposite.
You are 100% in the wrong here, and as yahoo62278 pointed out, all you are achieving is putting yourself on more and more campaign managers' blacklists.