Look, only concerns I have related to Betking are that the terms of the ICO never favoured and never will favour the investors. Also the fact that Dean Nolan has never accounted in any way about how many Betking tokens he holds and how many are his vis-a-vis how many are for the promotion and development etc. How much of ICO funds that were supposed to be used for the development of the site actually went to non-affiliated third party coders because to me and to many others it seems Dean Nolan already had a fully working site which did not need much or any work on it so did he pocket that large chunk of the ICO funds for his own pocket?
If Dean Nolan has decency he will sympathise with the concerns of the investors that lost almost everything while their investment directly went to making Dean Nolan a millionaire. He should at least work out a fair way to try to give something back to these investors and make some amends for his ways. Even if it wa s slow process but investors got their investment back then sure I will jump to the defence of Dean Nolan and ask investors to back off and allow him time to refund the investors but Dean Nolan has to take a step in the right direction.
I'll say this one last time. The biggest investors are all in our private token holder telegram group or have me on direct contact on telegram, skype or email.
None of them have the concerns you have been posting non stop for a week because they all read the terms of the ico before they bought tokens and have had constant updates from me.
The only things you, game-protect, chazley and a few others are posting here is speculation about things you don't know about (you are not a token holder), exaggerations, false information or outright lies (chazley being the worse there).
If you were an actual token holder and you were in the correct channels you would know everything that has went on with the site, costs, plans, how many tokens I've bought back, where funds have been spent on etc.
I've bought back enough where I now own over 70% of tokens. I'm not sure who you think has been done over.
Again, all major investors knew exactly the terms and what they were getting in to, like they did with countless other ICO's they bought in to, which have actually performed far worse than BetKing.
Are there a few people unhappy? Yes. But they are mostly people who didn't do due diligence and read the details of the ico before they bought tokens, like people do with a lot of other ico's. Most of these people have sold all their tokens back to me anyway.
So feel free to continue the spam attack and spreading false information but until you have a real token holder (easy to prove, it's crypto remember) then there is nothing for me to answer in this thread.