Today I was on a conference in Vilnius and went on a lecture about cryptocurrencies. I would like to share some aspects which I did't see so clear before. As we know, among those states which want to regulate cryptos, there are those which consider them as property and others as means of payment. The first approach is usually seen when there are tax companies around, because money is not taxed, but possession is. So when a state days they consider cryptos as property, it means they are getting taxed, while this is not the case with means of payment.
What do you think of this?
In my country taxes on btc trading was the same like property trading .Like a effect people had to pay more taxes than they have earned .But our bitcoin group is very good they have found it is against our constitution and now we have no tax on crypto currencies trading
Gov greedy was punished