And I ask you that, would you do it? would you made *any* decision that could affect millions based only in your judgement?
Oh, and whilst it is true no lone ranger is likely to be able to counter the network effect of Bitcoins if you have valid arguments and can persuade enough people (I suggest you engage differently or look elsewhere) there are plenty of options with different economic models e.g. Freicooin. Go support them
Sorry for beeing *maybe* pedanting but euro started as an experiment, so did the internet, the atomic bomb, but we all know by whom and to what ends. Conducting an experiment in the wild and after it goes viral you dissapear doesn't sound very responsible.
I for one like to always be in a position that maximizes my degrees of freedom. I can't understand the choice of pegging the parameters.
It reminds me of papers that start to create a model of reality and end up doing a fairly good job at it only to find the model too complex and unsolvable. Then in the conclusions they start simplifications, hidden assumptions, pegging parameters to make it solvable. But its not reality anymore. Here only to work bakwards get a solvable? simple model peg its parameters, make that a reality. But reality is known to be a bitch and will hack and slash.
And I have yet to listen to a single argument that deflation is good, all I hear is inflation is bad.