Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: What is better in poker: bluffing or playing only with good cards?
by
Wexnident
on 06/08/2018, 10:03:15 UTC
I've been watching some poker tournaments with Antonius, Negreanu and Cates lately. Most of the time the person with better combination actually wins, but there occur some great bluffs from time to time as well. Do you think it is better to fold if you don't have at least one high card in a pair or two cards of the same suit? Is it worth to try out overbetting tricks when you really have shitty cards? When I tried playing poker, overbetting usually made me fold, because it is a hard psychological attack for me and I am not the kind of a person that is willing to risk a lot. But I am bad at poker. What is your opinion on this matter?
Actually, all of the people that playing pokers has a different strategies or ways of playing. Sometimes, it is good to be a bluffer but it is much better that if we played with a good a better cards.  It is very hard to do bluffing because the  chances to win is also difficult. It can 50% to win and 50% to loose. However, playing having a good cards can gives a 90-99% chances of winning. But I think it is depends on the situations that it has in a certain time.