...
That's not true, our own one was on the front page when you posted.
...
I apologize, I just noticed this as well. I´m also glad that you actually decided
to unlock the original BetKing thread.
...
That post has nothing to do with the current ICO which was launched in July 2017. THe thread you linked to is from 2015.
...
I strongly disagree with this statement. If you were looking to sell the site
in 2015 while mentioning a shift of interest towards other projects as the reason
for selling, this information is obviously highly relevant when you raise millions for the same
project (even though it was rebranded) 2 years later. It is a bit of a stretch to claim
that this post has nothing to do with the ICO in 2017 when it is basically
the same project and the same owner.
If I contemplate to back a project with an investment, I obviously expect that the
owner is fully committed to the success of the project as well. You have to admit
that a post like this from 2015 may have created some scepticism with regards
to your future commitment to the project.
You are correct when you disagree with what Dean Nolan has stated. There are many of us who share the same view.
The fact he tried and failed to sell the site twice (as has been mentioned before by other users here) strengthens my opinion that this "project" and ICO has all the hallmarks of an investment campaign that was created with the sole purpose of making Dean Nolan wealthy.
He shutdown a moderately successful Betking website returning investors money and then re-launched the same website and same platform using an ICO with terms that basically guaranteed he will become a millionaire overnight and at the same time the structure ensured investors will get back next to nothing in profit and will lose large portions of their original investment.
What is more, the recent increase in activities by Dean Nolan by launching a couple of games and sponorships of various threads in this forum to try to improve the damaged image of both Betking and of himself looks extremely desperate. His activities are coinciding with the increase in people questioning Dean Nolan asking for proof that investors that lost money are happy.