Universal basic income, along with other welfare systems, create disincentives to work and otherwise generate income. As such, it would be a very bad thing if UBI, in any form were enacted.
The only instance in which I would support UBI in any form would be in places like AK where government income far exceeds expenditures, and the government can pay their citizens some amount every year from the income their assets generates.
There's no question that it would create a
slight disincentive to work, but I do not think that it would have an enormous effect on people's willingness to work.
Some basic income experiments have also shown this, but I'm careful not to over-generalize, since there have only been a limited number of experiments done.
https://qz.com/1205591/a-universal-basic-income-experiment-in-alaska-shows-employment-didnt-drop/Now it can definitely be said that most experiments do not include the enormous tax burden that would accompany UBI.
Here's another point of view:
https://www.cis.org.au/app/uploads/2017/11/rr32-snapshot.pdf (UBI Universal Basic Income is an Unbelievably Bad Idea)
I would much rather see the various welfare programs be eliminated and/or reformed over time then see some kind of UBI system be enacted that would likely only grow and expand over time.
Not really sure what you're implying here. I assume you mean that you think that welfare systems are currently run inefficiently? Or are you actually advocating completely removing all welfare systems?