Don't list shitcoins.
what is the ultimate, unbiased definition of a shitcoin?
Those ICOs that just offer money to get listed on a exchange and have no real future, and
have no intention to do what they promised. the last one is the one that can tbe taken the one with have no real future is already somehow biased, as it would imply a certain degree of perfectionism.
we suffered enough from banksters that constantly give power to the big the rich and the estaqblished making live for founders a hell, and for those established a paradise.
no point that we continue doing that now
what you could add here is "coins that are completely inactive, without working website or team not responding updating"