When any Person of this forum get connected with any fraudulent work or supporting any kinda work which is really harmful for rest of us and investor.Is it the only punishment to give him red trust.
I believe negative rating with reference link pointing to why someone was tagged is more than enough.Before giving RED TRUST to anyone i think DT members obviously investigate properly.but my question is isn't it alarming when we see someone have 1000 merits but got red trust. This kind of profile spoils our forum fame.
You are confusing merit, rank and trust.If you break forum rules then you should get warned (red tag) it does not matter if you have 1000 merits or you are a legendary member or even admin. Rules are rules. However, a defaulter should have enough rights to explain his reasons. If the reasons are not satisfactory then don't remove the red.
If someone do an on forum bad act (breaking rules) which is confirmed, then tag them but it's too much when you tag someone because you think this could lead to that. The experience you have had and the experience others have are not same besides just because you are a DT does not mean that you are a mind reader.
A confirmed rule breaker should defiantly get red tag, does not matter if he has 1000 merits and even a Legend. And in it I do not see any spoiling on the forum fame.
So you agree that this account should have been negative tagged long time ago https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4487800.msg40471597#msg40471597 , from its early days http://archive.is/Hkkow#selection-2781.0-2781.235 ?If someone do an on forum bad act (breaking rules) which is confirmed, then tag them but it's too much when you tag someone because you think this could lead to that. The experience you have had and the experience others have are not same besides just because you are a DT does not mean that you are a mind reader.
A confirmed rule breaker should defiantly get red tag, does not matter if he has 1000 merits and even a Legend. And in it I do not see any spoiling on the forum fame.
Self admitted rule breaker...
Quote
I was banned three times: 1 day, 7 days and then 14 days one I guess.
Merit beggar:
Reference link is pointing to post which was edited the same day:
Do you think this account should be tagged with -ve for begging merit, the same way this account was tagged with -ve:
Tell me, based on 1-5 and your observation of forum rules, trust system and scammers...
1) breaking forum rules
2) begging for merit
3) exchanging merit between family members
4) advertising refshare schemes
5) offering to escrow more than $100,000
...should people trust this account or tag this account with negative trust, to make sure - as OP said "...its our duty to ensure a safe environment here for our upcoming generation", we keep forum clean and safe?