Something bugs me in the technical parameters of this coin ...

14,700,000,000 coins are to be mined at the average rate of 5000 coins per minute ...
It will take a little more than 5.5 years, and after that only the transaction fees will reward the miners for their work on keeping the network alive.

Bitcoin and most alts progressively reduce the block subsidy to make this transition smoother ...

Don't get me wrong, I think an extremely fast reduction as seen in many coins these days only tags them as instamine & dump schemes (hello quark !^^)...

But in the long term (should 5 years really be considered long ? ^^), abruptly stopping block subsidy seems dangerous if the coin is here to stay ...
What motivated this choice of not progressively reducing subsidy ?


Also, maybe some hard checkpoints in the code would help with the fear a large damages in case of 51% attack ...
A Proof of Stake could help also, albeit this may be tricky to correctly implement (see for example the problems yacoin is currently experiencing)