Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
ldrgn
on 09/01/2014, 16:42:02 UTC
Can anyone say bASIC 2.0.

I had originally marked this up as bASIC 2.0 but when I saw the contract with eASIC I upgraded them to BFL.  I have now learned my lesson - never doubt the incompetence of Bitcoiners.

BTW, am I 4 for 4 on my checklist?  The first point maybe not (sounds like he did some coding) but the large amount of engineering work he hasn't done makes the point more true than false.  IMO.

edit: also interesting to see all the names which no longer grace this thread...