We use the word "evolution" in different ways. For example, the Model T Ford evolved over many years into the variety of Ford vehicles that we have today. This, however, is not what is meant by evolution theory evolution (ETE). ETE does not match the evolution of Ford cars except in the simple way that both of them are change. The rest of ETE doesn't match what happened in Ford car evolution.
This is the same with nature, life, and the world around us. Certainly there is change. So, in that simple sense there is evolution, just like in Ford cars. The thing that has not been found in changes in the world around is a change from one species to another in nature. Yet that is exactly what is required for ETE to exist... along with a bunch of other changes.
Adaptation is not necessarily a learned trait. In fact, cause and effect highly suggests that it is built in rather than learned, and that the whole process of teaching and learning is the effect of causes. Teaching and learning follows complex laws of physics. We think they are simple because we don't understand much of the complexity. It just happens. But cause and effect dictates how it happens, and the ways the changes happen through learning. Training is set in place by cause and effect.
What does such training have to do with evolution? It is change... semantics. But it is not the kind of change talked about in ETE.
ETE is a hoax, i.e., evolution is a hoax.
This is the same with nature, life, and the world around us. Certainly there is change. So, in that simple sense there is evolution, just like in Ford cars. The thing that has not been found in changes in the world around is a change from one species to another in nature. Yet that is exactly what is required for ETE to exist... along with a bunch of other changes.
Adaptation is not necessarily a learned trait. In fact, cause and effect highly suggests that it is built in rather than learned, and that the whole process of teaching and learning is the effect of causes. Teaching and learning follows complex laws of physics. We think they are simple because we don't understand much of the complexity. It just happens. But cause and effect dictates how it happens, and the ways the changes happen through learning. Training is set in place by cause and effect.
What does such training have to do with evolution? It is change... semantics. But it is not the kind of change talked about in ETE.
ETE is a hoax, i.e., evolution is a hoax.
I dont understand what it is you need to find?
You want to find 1-10 specimens of a given kind, for every year, spanning a million years 100 million years in the future. It is not going to happened, they are not available anymore, they are gone, dust.
Those specimens we have are at best 1000 of years apart, at worse millions. Lots happen in these timeframes. You are never going to find, offspring after offspring spanning 1000 of years, in order to see a finger turn into flipper, or reverse or something like that. Does not mean you cant find two specimens 100.000 - 500.000 years apart, with some sort of evolution.
As I said earlier, prove to me that the average height of humans have increased 10-20cm in the span of 200 years. But do it in 100 million years time. You cant. But it did happen. They are going to have a likewise discussion by then, like us, on just this subject.
Evolution is observable on the daily basic, on trillions of examples, including humans.
In 25k years they are going to argue about whether the Giza pyramids even existed.
He thinks animals randomly and spontaneously pop into existence then die and another species of animal pop into existence with features that would seem like evolution did it but nope. That's basically what he thinks.