Why is this thread still not locked ?
Bloody scammer
Scammer or not, it's for the community to decide and police it. The forum's policy is to monitor the basics such as spam, off-topic threads, not scams.Bloody scammer
The guy admitted to be a scammer
Do you need more proof?
Why is this thread still not locked ?
Bloody scammer
Scammer or not, it's for the community to decide and police it. The forum's policy is to monitor the basics such as spam, off-topic threads, not scams.Bloody scammer
The guy admitted to be a scammer
He wasn't saying it sarcastically; he was being mocking and just rubbing it in.
So is this actually a scammer-tolerant forum, i.e. scammers ain't banned, and their threads ain't locked? What other libertarianisms does it allow?
My goodness, I truly am a Lawful Good little mouse
My goodness, I truly am a Lawful Good little mouse
The rules are somewhat paradoxical at times. Scammers usually arent banned but spammers sometimes are, and each mod has a different definition or what a actually spammer is.
Meanwhile in BitcoinTalk people see a scammer and each user with different amounts of rep rates him appropriately. Another user dealing with him sees the ratings and makes a descision to trade with him or to cancel the deal.
The whole discussion started because he wasn't banned and the thread wasn't locked. I was talking about the policy, not separate cases. In this case, yeah, I know, he's a lowlife scammer, but the policy is that the community decides if he's guilty not the mods.