Are you denying that you promoted a ponzi ?
I have never promoted any ponzi
on the forum not even since I have started my journey here. After
that last video I left all the online affilaite businesses promoting for others.
In order to be able to post more information and ensure that google cannot index it I moved it to the investigations forum in accordance to the rules.
You moved them. Before they were
on this topic (now in meta) which was against the forum rule.
...oftentimes doxxing someone is used as a weapon in itself instead of a part of any investigation, and as a result innocent people are sometimes hurt. So to protect the innocent while hopefully not hampering scam investigations too much, here are some new rules on doxxing:
....It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures.....
...It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon....
What happened: Looking at my feedback I found that I had been tagged for "Merit abuse" by a nobody
It is not allowed to post someone's dox if it is especially obvious that you're just using the dox as a weapon
-------------
If you defend yourself then you explain your actions. You can't explain your involvement in the ponzi so you create a diversion instead.
How am I creating diversion? Everything I posted on
this post was to explain your actions on deleting/editing/updating posts without keeping much references which then changed the direction and turned the table completely to the wrong side.
Also to quotes from verious people to bring the attention of what they thought at that time. You were even harassing some of them saying that they are connected to me (DdmrDdmr and theyoungmillionaire).
One of them (theyoungmillionaire) even PMed me expecting I will do something to stop you.Proves that others felt harassed by you.@theyoungmillionaire : mate, I hope I do not offend you, I really need these stuffs to protect my image. I hope you understand my desperacy. Bringing everyting was relavent coz marlboroza tagged me for promoting ponzi which mainly based on the investigation and scam accusition (now on meta) topic you started.
you are creating a diversion by trying to make me look bad.
I do not want you to look bad even not anyone. Your actions towards me was bad, you found a weapon and started to spreading lies that I have promoted ponzi on the forum, my twitter pomotion is to promote ponzi all sorts of misleading information (I can make a long list of the lies if you want to see). I understand it sounds bad when I talk about it but
you actually brought all my past life and strategically manipulated the information to hurt my reputation on the forum. Things could really ended up nicely if I could get a good constructive response of
this post which was made in response of his earlier two posts in a row
1,
2.
I had/have nothing personal with you. Have I bought anyone from
here? They also have problems with me like you have.
Effectively you are harassing and stalking me by doing that. You could just never mention my name again and then I never will reply to you again.
How could I? Everytime I am going to defend myself I will need to bring the investigation topic and the scam accusations topic as a reference. When I bring these topics your mention comes by default because those are your masterpiece.
By the way, may be the definition of stalking does not mean the same that you are thinking of. You were stalking my personal information, not only mine but my wife's social media.
Remember, no man will not like anyone who will point their finger to his family.
I was talking about uday when he was not proven guilty (completely)
completely
The image says,
What if I told you I am guilty
But not completely?
Considering the early stage, I can not just justify someone whitout having enough evidence.
nobody knew what was in his mind to be honest
The picture is nice although it says complete diffent story. It's like...
I cant afford it.
How can I afford it?7. ...One dad had a habit of saying, I cant afford it. The other dad forbade those words to be used. He insisted I ask, How can I afford it? One is a statement, and the other is a question. One lets you off the hook, and the other forces you to think.
I never promoted any of them on the forum
any of them
Yes, none of them. Can you point one?
I bring you when I find something related to your accusations about me promoted ponzi on the forum (lie) or promoting my social media here to advertise ponzi (lie) etc etc.
If It never happened
on the forum then, accusation for promoting them
on the forum is a lie, isn't it?
Why are you bringing all this "I have never promoted scam on forum" crap? What difference does it make?
It's debatable.
By the way, I still haven't got my answer
And how about the time?