I have been perusing and concentrate a considerable measure about this thing. Lightning system usage sounds a smart thought to everybody as it can spare high exchange expenses. In any case, since the two gatherings straightforwardly execute with each other then I can state that it is a brought together in that way. There are still inquiries that are flying up in my mind like there are as yet expected weaknesses that may understanding, at that point how might we settle that issue?

From my understanding, Lightning Network is a unified stage that is worked as a layer from Bitcoin which is decentralized. On the off chance that lightning system flops at that point there can be numerous different frameworks that are gone for and the one that works the best will turn into the standard. In the event that you don't care for utilizing a concentrated stage you can simply adhere to the principle chain. The charges may make you not have any desire to however.

I think lightning system is centralization, since this lightning system is a product that isn't a piece of blockchain framework, yet in the event that bitcoin convention applies lightning system, it can incorporate worldwide money related exchange volume speedier, and less expensive cost.

as I would see it the key is in "who can run a lightning hub/center point?" as long as it is anyone who needs (which is the situation and now there is motivator to run a hub) at that point I don't perceive any sort of centralization in this. you are as yet associating with a distributed system and making an exchange on it. much the same as some other p2p organize there might be peers by banks, government, shady individuals, ordinary people,... yet, the good thing that I comprehend about LN is that the handing-off hubs don't think about the birthplace and goal of the exchanges they get, they simply pass it along and know it doesn't have a place with them.