Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.
As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.
I quite agree with you on this, the success or failure of an ico does not lie in the hands of the manager but mostly depend on the team of the ico as well as what the project has to offer. As regards the second question, I do not have a problem with who is posting the bounty information, all I care about is how successful it will be because that is where my reward lies and besides, if he of she is not competent enough, he will not be assigned by the team to manage the bounty campaign.