Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Make restrictions for juniors members
by
finaleshot2016
on 18/08/2018, 15:36:43 UTC
Member - 15 merit
Full Member - 110 merit
Senior Member - 270 merit
Hero Member - 520 merit
Legendary Member - 1040 merit

This is also a good way to handle a campaign, bounty managers should  make it like this.
Indeed. Mods can't do this alone, campaign managers should also help them to fight the spammy and shitty posters (particularly the low ranked ones) by requiring the forum members to meet first the merit requirement  before applying so that all of the applicants are even more filtered and only the good ones could enter the campaign. A win to win situation after all — it will result to a healthy ICO advertisement and the crappy posters are now easy to eradicate at the same time since they now feel demotivated.

The trouble is is you can't make bounty managers do this, so their hand needs to essentially be forced. Get rid of signatures for Juniors or at the least require some sort of merit achievement to become one. That would help drastically and then ICO campaigns would no longer be able to accept the bots and the worst of the worst to spam whatever they wanted. Punishments also need to happen for campaigns who do nothing but pay people to spam or copy and paste. Those two simple solutions would help drastically.  

Well, bounty manager should be informed regarding this issue but i think they knew it at the very beginning that spamming is a serious problem. We should also implement a requirements for managing an ICO here. Some people create new accounts for the promotion of their own project, we didn't know if it's a scam and many of them don't really care about the rules. Bounty managers might accept Jr. Members or maybe Newbies and encourage them to do shitposting just for the promotion of the project. They should be at least Full Members or be a Copper Member to increase the credibility of being a manager.

#JrMembers5MeritRequirements