Well you, an account farmer, would say this. How many accounts are you farming? How many of your accounts have you had banned now? Which ones of these are yours that I've noticed posting in the exact same threads as you:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2247852 Zayn_Nazy June 30, 2018
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2280178 Willie_Linder July 14, 2018
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2279012 katherin_panini July 13, 2018
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2271482 Michael_Cox July 10, 2018
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2280138 James_Cline July 14, 2018
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2272791 Sherwood_Archer July 11, 2018
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2271537 Aidan_Davis July 10, 2018Besides, you stop it the same way we don't allow users to sell weapons or post ref links here. If they list an account for sale it gets removed or they get banned. As ThePharmacist said, it's not rocket science.
I literally have no idea what you're talking about. I only recognize seeing a couple of these accounts on the forum.
We might as well get rid of all rules then. We can't do anything about ban evasion or rule breaking. Therefore, don't ban people and let them do what they want?
Well, some violations of the rules are very easy to see and enforce punishment, but some are much more difficult. I guess sometimes it's obvious when an account is sold, but sometimes it's not so apparent. Either way, for some reason admins didn't make this rules.
If we went with my suggestion of allowing people to purchase the equivalent rank in things like Silver and Gold Memberships account sales would mostly cease to happen. People only buy them for signature campaigns and half of the time the people selling them are either scammers who don't have any accounts to sell in the first place or hackers/shitposting farmers. If account sales are going to happen then let them safely buy them from the forum. It's win win. There are no negatives to this at all.
This does sound like a pretty good option. I guess it would require rethinking criteria for signature campaigns though. Then the only real measure of a person's rank would be how much money they put into it. It would definitely be good to support the site though.