Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
(which includes my already assertion that it takes a whole hell-of-a-lot of posting of bullshit nonsense in order to get banned from this forum, which Anunymint/shelby has accomplished on numerous occasions, which also substantiates the likelihood that his ideas don't really deserve any special treatment because even he was not able to present them without unnecessary and irrelevant provocations.
JayJuanGoyim, you will agree with Anonymint whether you like it or not:
The realrOach is making some sense. Is something wrong in the world?
@MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658
I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-forkold clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers.
I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-forkold clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers.
It's a bullshit argument. If it changes the security model at all, even slightly, it's a change in fungibility, and thus a hard fork because fungibility was altered. They only attempt to use this poor argument because bitcoin isn't even fungible (and thus impossible to be money) in the first place. So the Luke Jr "soft fork" hack is really a hard fork. You'll notice Jbreher stole this argument of mine and used it to try and promote Bcash lol.
It's getting old watching these people in cryptocurrency trying to raise and lower levers up and down to do arbitrary changes at will exactly like Keynesian central bankers while pretending these things are "decentralized".
They're completely centralized on both the development front and mining front. This stuff is all a complete joke decentralization-wise compared to physical metals.
Oh my gawd!!!!!
Two posts in a row making sense from roach the poach.
One thing I find interesting is people pretending the implosion of Bitmain is a non-factor in Bitcoin. As I've said a billion times before, a single entity operating on Bitfinex controls the entire bitcoin market. There are very few possibilities for this entity:
1) Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)
2) Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs
3) The ESF
4) The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)
In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.
1) Chinese mining cartel (Bitmain)
2) Some TBTF Jew bank like Goldman Sachs
3) The ESF
4) The Bitfinex owners themselves operating in MtGox fashion (already know they're involved for sure as co-conspirators, but it might not be their money/trades and they might just take a cut as hush money)
In other words, if this single entity operating on Bitfinex that controls the entire bitcoin price turns out to be Bitmain and Bitmain leaves the market, this market is fucked.
Whew!!!!!! What a relief!!!!! Back to normal with some bitcoin is gonna die from one cause nonsense. I feel better now.
