We had a very interesting discussion over the weekend and people debated if it was better to invest in property or to invest in Bitcoin. The argument was as follows :
1. Most people cannot afford to buy property, so they take a home loan at a Bank. The home loan is paid back with interest and some of these loans are spread out over 20 years to make it
affordable to the person who takes out the loan. So, over that 20 years the house of $100 000 will cost you say $1 000 000. {$900 000 paid in interest}
The argument is also that the property has to increase in value, with more than $900 000 for you to say that it was a good investment AND you have to sell that property to get that profit.
2. The other side of the room said it was better to rent a smaller property and to invest the "savings" into something like Bitcoin, because your profit will pay for a bigger deposit or even a whole property in a few years time.
I think paying a high interest rate to a Bank is just as bad as paying rent to a Landlord, because you are getting screwed in both these circumstances.

We all want to live in big houses that we cannot afford.

Oh come on, where did you get those interest rates ($900k interest for a loan of $100k)? This is absolutely unrealistic!
Then, the comparison of the banks' interest rate with rent to a landlord is also incorrect: after you have successfully paid out the loan you get the house/flat into your own PROPERTY, i.e. you can do whatever you want with it (give it to your offsprings, sell it at a higher price, take second mortgage credit, etc.).
So I would prefer taking loan and having a property instead of the possibility to lose all my money in a market crash.