Not really. Heres your thread from now and your thread from November 2017. You decided to change the rules after you had the funds in hand.
https://imgur.com/gallery/pSfxTSl
Those are policies that apply to CET; it has nothing to do with deals that were already in progress and it has changed in late 2017 IIRC (not March 2018). Assuming that the last thread update definitely corresponds to a policy change just shows how ridiculous the allegations are. As said, not a single claim in this thread is true.
You had funds in escrow.
Forks happened.
You updated your thread to state that you keep all forked coins.
I can almost guarantee that you are one of the only people that thinks this allegation is ridiculous.
Wow, it looks like you got negatively rated for pointing this out? Insane... You even
asked for clarity previously and got nothing but deflecting answers and insults.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=289011You refuse to sign a message or even provide them with an address where the funds are being held, after numerous requests.
Asking the impossible. It's no surprise that neither you nor your master understand how Bitcoin works.
Maybe it was due to you pointing out his refusal to sign an address he used for the multisig escrow, which led to the fact that Lauda doesn't understand that signers on a multisig address can still sign messages using the key they used in the multisig address, putting a huge hole in his argument of why he couldn't prove the funds he claimed to hold?