He even posted evidence...
What he posted is of no relevance to this thread. The policy change has nothing to do with NVO. If you jump to conclusions when you have: a) No evidence. b) No facts. c) No knowledge of anything that's been going on in the NVO ecosystem for the past 12 months, then you clearly are biased in one way or another. Thus, he intentionally made slanderous statements.
Semantics really is the weakest argument.
It isn't semantics, it is cryptography. There is no multisig signing standard.
what is the new excuse for why you can't do it? Why are you purposely being difficult and secretive when you have a public blockchain available to prove funds and explain every transfer made?
You haven't read anything in the thread, again.
The 'you are absolutely required to post proof for me or you're a scammer' argument is a
false dilemma anyways. The "proof" will automatically be provided once the refunds start being deployed (which is hopefully next week).