How has it been debunked? It's a fact.
A "fact" made up to suite your own vendetta.After you received funds for this ICO escrow deal, you changed your escrow terms to state that you get to keep the forked funds. There is evidence you did this. It happened. Are you saying that the evidence provided is fraudulent.
Yes; the out-of-context "evidence" is fraudulent in the way that it was presented. The policy change is for CET, in the CET thread for future escrow deals[1]; it has nothing to do with NVO escrow terms which were made before Bcash was a thing.[1] Unless of course you're trying to state that I'm not allowed to change my policies for the future deals that I might accept
