Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Lauda, MinerJones, Blazed | Missing escrow funds
by
pugman
on 23/08/2018, 22:58:06 UTC
⭐ Merited by vlom (1)
Has anybody offered to do an audit? I would recommend ibminer, he's known to be an unbiased judge of circumstances.


From what I can tell, based on what I have read :

The NVO escrow terms and CET terms are different. So the BCH/other forks scam doesn't really apply here.

Yanni and Nemgun are telling different stories.

You can't really sign messages of a multi-sig, even if you can, it may compromise the all 3 seeds along with the money it.

Blazed, minerjones and Coinpayments haven't replied here, so Lauda is taking a lot of blame and accusations/allegations. 

The 1000 btc isn't really missing, its that, the alts were converted into BTC at a specific rate(?) I am confused on this one, Lauda, you said, this was the exchange rate, and how did they suddenly reduce? I am sorry, this thread is a mess, has more of irrelevant info than the relevant and useful one, cite a link, if you have replied to this before. Were the alts exchanged recently?

So the funds are in multi-sig at the moment and not in an exchange, right?

Anything else am I missing?