His argument is that if randomness doesn't exist, someone or something must have put everything in motion however he fails to realize that for example, if the big bang is the beginning of the universe, the big bang isn't sentient, it didn't put things in motion knowingly. He is basically assuming, nothing is random and also assuming the creator of the universe is god, it's a classic badecker argument where he just assumes incredible things without any proof.
Let's say that we absolutely don't know what started the universe. None of this has anything to do with evolution. Why not? Because C&E proves that ETE can't exist. How? By C&E being programming, and by nothing other than C&E ever having been observed in any way. Your idea that radiation is pure random is theory, and very poor theory at that.
