Well, I do agree with you, and I think that even 53 votes for NitrogenSports.eu are not enough votes for anyone to think that without no doubt they are the best bookie here. We just don't have enough votes for any bookie here, but I can't do anything about that. I keep the thread active a much as I can, and the site users need to decide to help others with their opinion, like you did.
I do believe that these ranks give a decent indicator on what bookies to try, specially if people combine them with other ranks out there.
Bitcoinrush for example has a decent score, with 3 votes, so maybe that could work as an incentive for someone to try them out and then vote for themselves.
.
yes I know mate and you are doing great
my point is that users shouldn't just rely on a list and they should research more and more , cause as I said most of people here like nitrogen since it's been around for years now and their margin is kinda lower
I just want people to check other sites like rush and give it a chance , this way maybe nitrogen will lower their margin more to compete with rush
competition between sites should allow players to have better odds in the future since all the sites will compete to get the players