I see your points, but a lot of my time lately is just taken up dealing with endless FUD directed at me personally.
We all know the damage that FUD can create, especially if it goes un-managed and/or ignored, but by doing that, the flip side is that the development of the project and the time already ploughed into it suffers instead.
If eMunie was launched already and had a solid user base, then it wouldn't be an issue and could more readily be ignored. That time has not come to pass yet, so to ensure the continued progress of the project, this seemed to me to be the best move at this moment in time.
But how do you expect to get a solid user base (aka. good distribution) when you cancel the public IPO?
The less people buying in the presale, the more scam accusations will there be.
And opposite. For every extra person buying eMunie in the presale you got 1 more indivdual supporting the project.
One way is to perform a public IPO immediately on launch with a limited amount of currency, with the same terms as what was specified already.
That way the general public that aren't a bunch of trolls can participate, and the project can no longer be called a scam, as its out there.
I'm open to thoughts and suggestions, but bear in mind that my primary concern right now is system development, not investment. It's always been that way, but with a preference of the initial user base is ready to go on the day.
As we've seen that's caused some issues, so my current thinking is something along the lines of the above.